Quantity: Sarah has many posts relating to her theme of art in Shakespeare; there are enough and varied posts to get a good picture of her research and her studies.
Content: She has a good mix of exploratory and expository posts, and certainly some are casual while some are analytical. I think she blends these two different syles well. There are many images showing different art representations of Shakespeare, and there are a couple examples of other types of media.
Format: She utilizes the Jump Break really well, some posts are tagged with subjects, and her titles are generally helpful.
Thematic Focus: The blog has a clear theme, but the hub post doesn't show much development (it simply labels the posts, without any links.)
Thesis & Cohesion: Her hub post details the thesis well, but there aren't any links to previous posts to make them easier to find.
Sources: Sources are appropriately cited and linked throughout the blog; no specific post of references linked to hub post.
Author Identity: Good "About Me" section, personal picture, personally connection to topics, and overall design of the blog.
Interactions: I was impressed with how well Sarah connected with other students through their comments on her blog. She interacted nicely and referred to outside interactions throughout her blog.
Design: The design is appropriate and interesting, and the side content is helpful and appropriate, not distracting in any way.
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Evaluating Sarah Bown
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Evaluating Sarah Bown
2011-04-05T22:50:00-07:00
Johnny Allred
midsemester-night's delusions|sarah bown|student evaluation|